如果真係信主會得救 唔信真係會落地獄 問你地會唔會後悔就實話唔後悔 係自己抵死架啦 但神叫人要去傳福音 救返世界個D不信既人 我自己覺得唔同人會有唔同方式去叫人信 有D的確係幾煩 但若果件事係真既 呢D人真係實踐緊愛 利申︰信耶穌信主唔係剩係相信有主就得 係要全心全意信奉上主先得 再唔明就番去問牧師 你地個上主性格有缺陷仲點叫我信主
咩係one one呀Yes! You are absolutely right One one can prove they are wrong or don't exist But you can choose not to believe in them thats all I said for the whole time所以唔可以話道教係錯conventional logic所以唔可以話回教係錯layman就layman啦 再者，deity都唔係testable hypothesis 點同I can turn into an unicorn同I have a baseball類比？
你打到中文做乜要打英文 係咪覺得打英文好威威乜你唔識英文？可唔可以搵耶拎解讀完話我知咩黎唔緊要,陪番佢講洪秀全,穆罕默德,哪吒同關二哥,佢地就會癲First, like I said, "I have a baseball" and "There is a God" are not analogous because the former has testable implication (e.g. you can check his pocket etc.) while the second one does not. Therefore, your comics mean nothing. You can try understand what I am saying or you can keep getting high about your brilliant arguments and ignore everything against them, your choice. Second, I can't believe you still asking 洪秀全,穆罕默德,哪吒同關二哥 those things and expect that is going to support your argument. I am just gonna say it one more time, if you dun understand, its fine but I am pretty sure what I am gonna say now is right: On the issue of whether God exists, there are three philosophical stances (let's say 3 for the sake of simplicity) : 1. Theism http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theism These people argue for the existence of God 2. Atheism http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atheism These people argue there isn't a deity. 3. Agnosticism http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agnosticism These peoeple think the answer of the question whether there is a God is unknown or unknowable. This is a local form of skepticism in contrast with the global skepticism which doubts the possibility of acquisition of any knowledge. Let's make my standpoint very clear: philosophically, I am a agnoticism because I am fully aware of the untestable nature of deity but religiously I believe or choose to believe in God.
既然係咁，點解你問 "但你有咩論點去證明無造物主？ "如果真係信主會得救 唔信真係會落地獄 問你地會唔會後悔就實話唔後悔 係自己抵死架啦 但神叫人要去傳福音 救返世界個D不信既人 我自己覺得唔同人會有唔同方式去叫人信 有D的確係幾煩 但若果件事係真既 呢D人真係實踐緊愛 利申︰信耶穌Then they will start ask you to prove God exist if you can't prove then they will jump to the conclusion that God doesnt exist and the evangelical peopel are wasting their valuable time
Read the lengthy comment, dun want to explain to u no more既然係咁，點解你問 "但你有咩論點去證明無造物主？ "如果真係信主會得救 唔信真係會落地獄 問你地會唔會後悔就實話唔後悔 係自己抵死架啦 但神叫人要去傳福音 救返世界個D不信既人 我自己覺得唔同人會有唔同方式去叫人信 有D的確係幾煩 但若果件事係真既 呢D人真係實踐緊愛 利申︰信耶穌Then they will start ask you to prove God exist if you can't prove then they will jump to the conclusion that God doesnt exist and the evangelical peopel are wasting their valuable time
You said you can read English oh now you dun just want to control what I believe u hv to control what language I write in too?你打到中文做乜要打英文 係咪覺得打英文好威威乜你唔識英文？可唔可以搵耶拎解讀完話我知咩黎唔緊要,陪番佢講洪秀全,穆罕默德,哪吒同關二哥,佢地就會癲First, like I said, "I have a baseball" and "There is a God" are not analogous because the former has testable implication (e.g. you can check his pocket etc.) while the second one does not. Therefore, your comics mean nothing. You can try understand what I am saying or you can keep getting high about your brilliant arguments and ignore everything against them, your choice. Second, I can't believe you still asking 洪秀全,穆罕默德,哪吒同關二哥 those things and expect that is going to support your argument. I am just gonna say it one more time, if you dun understand, its fine but I am pretty sure what I am gonna say now is right: On the issue of whether God exists, there are three philosophical stances (let's say 3 for the sake of simplicity) : 1. Theism http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theism These people argue for the existence of God 2. Atheism http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atheism These people argue there isn't a deity. 3. Agnosticism http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agnosticism These peoeple think the answer of the question whether there is a God is unknown or unknowable. This is a local form of skepticism in contrast with the global skepticism which doubts the possibility of acquisition of any knowledge. Let's make my standpoint very clear: philosophically, I am a agnoticism because I am fully aware of the untestable nature of deity but religiously I believe or choose to believe in God.
求求你打番中文得唔得既然係咁，點解你問 "但你有咩論點去證明無造物主？ "如果真係信主會得救 唔信真係會落地獄 問你地會唔會後悔就實話唔後悔 係自己抵死架啦 但神叫人要去傳福音 救返世界個D不信既人 我自己覺得唔同人會有唔同方式去叫人信 有D的確係幾煩 但若果件事係真既 呢D人真係實踐緊愛 利申︰信耶穌Then they will start asking you to prove the existence of God if you can't prove that God is real then they will jump to the conclusion that God doesnt exist and the evangelical peopel always wasting their valuable time
http://translate.google.com/求求你打番中文得唔得既然係咁，點解你問 "但你有咩論點去證明無造物主？ "如果真係信主會得救 唔信真係會落地獄 問你地會唔會後悔就實話唔後悔 係自己抵死架啦 但神叫人要去傳福音 救返世界個D不信既人 我自己覺得唔同人會有唔同方式去叫人信 有D的確係幾煩 但若果件事係真既 呢D人真係實踐緊愛 利申︰信耶穌Then they will start asking you to prove the existence of God if you can't prove that God is real then they will jump to the conclusion that God doesnt exist and the evangelical peopel always wasting their valuable time
中国語を入力してくださいYou said you can read English oh now you dun just want to control what I believe u hv to control what language I write in too?你打到中文做乜要打英文 係咪覺得打英文好威威乜你唔識英文？可唔可以搵耶拎解讀完話我知咩黎唔緊要,陪番佢講洪秀全,穆罕默德,哪吒同關二哥,佢地就會癲First, like I said, "I have a baseball" and "There is a God" are not analogous because the former has testable implication (e.g. you can check his pocket etc.) while the second one does not. Therefore, your comics mean nothing. You can try understand what I am saying or you can keep getting high about your brilliant arguments and ignore everything against them, your choice. Second, I can't believe you still asking 洪秀全,穆罕默德,哪吒同關二哥 those things and expect that is going to support your argument. I am just gonna say it one more time, if you dun understand, its fine but I am pretty sure what I am gonna say now is right: On the issue of whether God exists, there are three philosophical stances (let's say 3 for the sake of simplicity) : 1. Theism http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theism These people argue for the existence of God 2. Atheism http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atheism These people argue there isn't a deity. 3. Agnosticism http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agnosticism These peoeple think the answer of the question whether there is a God is unknown or unknowable. This is a local form of skepticism in contrast with the global skepticism which doubts the possibility of acquisition of any knowledge. Let's make my standpoint very clear: philosophically, I am a agnoticism because I am fully aware of the untestable nature of deity but religiously I believe or choose to believe in God.
第10頁你問 "但你有咩論點去證明無造物主？ " 咁我見你問得咁開心, 我咪問下 "你有咩論點去證明無杖戎委床栥暯波 ？ " 第17頁你就答"Why do I need to prove 杖戎委床栥暯波 does not exist?" 你問得, 我唔問得 然後"dun want to explain to u no more" 好威威Read the lengthy comment, dun want to explain to u no more既然係咁，點解你問 "但你有咩論點去證明無造物主？ "如果真係信主會得救 唔信真係會落地獄 問你地會唔會後悔就實話唔後悔 係自己抵死架啦 但神叫人要去傳福音 救返世界個D不信既人 我自己覺得唔同人會有唔同方式去叫人信 有D的確係幾煩 但若果件事係真既 呢D人真係實踐緊愛 利申︰信耶穌Then they will start ask you to prove God exist if you can't prove then they will jump to the conclusion that God doesnt exist and the evangelical peopel are wasting their valuable time
你打英文打到錯拎晒仲有面叫我translatehttp://translate.google.com/求求你打番中文得唔得既然係咁，點解你問 "但你有咩論點去證明無造物主？ "如果真係信主會得救 唔信真係會落地獄 問你地會唔會後悔就實話唔後悔 係自己抵死架啦 但神叫人要去傳福音 救返世界個D不信既人 我自己覺得唔同人會有唔同方式去叫人信 有D的確係幾煩 但若果件事係真既 呢D人真係實踐緊愛 利申︰信耶穌Then they will start asking you to prove the existence of God if you can't prove that God is real then they will jump to the conclusions that God doesnt exist and the evangelical peopleare wasting their valuable time
It s a rhetorical question第10頁你問 "但你有咩論點去證明無造物主？ " 咁我見你問得咁開心, 我咪問下 "你有咩論點去證明無杖戎委床栥暯波 ？ " 第17頁你就答"Why do I need to prove 杖戎委床栥暯波 does not exist?" 你問得, 我唔問得 然後"dun want to explain to u no more" 好威威Read the lengthy comment, dun want to explain to u no more既然係咁，點解你問 "但你有咩論點去證明無造物主？ "如果真係信主會得救 唔信真係會落地獄 問你地會唔會後悔就實話唔後悔 係自己抵死架啦 但神叫人要去傳福音 救返世界個D不信既人 我自己覺得唔同人會有唔同方式去叫人信 有D的確係幾煩 但若果件事係真既 呢D人真係實踐緊愛 利申︰信耶穌Then they will start ask you to prove God exist if you can't prove then they will jump to the conclusion that God doesnt exist and the evangelical peopel are wasting their valuable time
あなたは堂々と賢いIt s a rhetorical question第10頁你問 "但你有咩論點去證明無造物主？ " 咁我見你問得咁開心, 我咪問下 "你有咩論點去證明無杖戎委床栥暯波 ？ " 第17頁你就答"Why do I need to prove 杖戎委床栥暯波 does not exist?" 你問得, 我唔問得 然後"dun want to explain to u no more" 好威威Read the lengthy comment, dun want to explain to u no more既然係咁，點解你問 "但你有咩論點去證明無造物主？ "如果真係信主會得救 唔信真係會落地獄 問你地會唔會後悔就實話唔後悔 係自己抵死架啦 但神叫人要去傳福音 救返世界個D不信既人 我自己覺得唔同人會有唔同方式去叫人信 有D的確係幾煩 但若果件事係真既 呢D人真係實踐緊愛 利申︰信耶穌Then they will start ask you to prove God exist if you can't prove then they will jump to the conclusion that God doesnt exist and the evangelical peopel are wasting their valuable time
仲有, 在網上世界你都唔想再同 杖戎委床栥暯波拎講落去 可能好多原因--討厭、黑人憎、講唔聽等等, 我總結為都係因為"煩" 咁你又點可以怪人在現實生活對住耶拎, 會覺得耶拎煩?所有耶拎都煩？
佢有冇講過話所有耶拎仲有, 在網上世界你都唔想再同 杖戎委床栥暯波拎講落去 可能好多原因--討厭、黑人憎、講唔聽等等, 我總結為都係因為"煩" 咁你又點可以怪人在現實生活對住耶拎, 會覺得耶拎煩?所有耶拎都煩？
當然唔係, 只係俾你知點解我覺得煩 我只係做緊你覺得冇問題o既野 就係將D我覺得係好o既野"推介"俾你仲有, 在網上世界你都唔想再同 杖戎委床栥暯波拎講落去 可能好多原因--討厭、黑人憎、講唔聽等等, 我總結為都係因為"煩" 咁你又點可以怪人在現實生活對住耶拎, 會覺得耶拎煩?所有耶拎都煩？
耶拎真係好拎恐怖x2
其實大陸都有好人,回教徒都有愛好和平,唔放炸彈佢有冇講過話所有耶拎仲有, 在網上世界你都唔想再同 杖戎委床栥暯波拎講落去 可能好多原因--討厭、黑人憎、講唔聽等等, 我總結為都係因為"煩" 咁你又點可以怪人在現實生活對住耶拎, 會覺得耶拎煩?所有耶拎都煩？而且就算只有一個耶拎煩都可以影響其他人對耶拎既印像 依加仲要唔止係得一個 btw你打到中文喇 點解岩岩上主要令你打唔到中文
其實大陸都有好人,回教徒都有愛好和平,唔放炸彈佢有冇講過話所有耶拎仲有, 在網上世界你都唔想再同 杖戎委床栥暯波拎講落去 可能好多原因--討厭、黑人憎、講唔聽等等, 我總結為都係因為"煩" 咁你又點可以怪人在現實生活對住耶拎, 會覺得耶拎煩?所有耶拎都煩？而且就算只有一個耶拎煩都可以影響其他人對耶拎既印像 依加仲要唔止係得一個 btw你打到中文喇 點解岩岩上主要令你打唔到中文