加勒比海
2小時
fifa infantino 保送球蝗
講事實摟曬班梅西蝗蟲走出嚟洗版![[noic]cl](/faces/clown/noeyec.gif)
透過 HKG Web 分享一則貼文:【體育台】FIFA幫到盡美國同葡萄牙都出局
https://forum.hkgolden.com/thread/8066695/page/1
弱智盲蚡:出post幫丙朗洗白仲唔係朗迷
盲蚡:我唔知我唔理,唔撐阿根廷就一定係朗迷

透過 HKG Web 分享一則貼文:【體育台】FIFA幫到盡美國同葡萄牙都出局
https://forum.hkgolden.com/thread/8066695/page/1
弱智盲蚡:出post幫丙朗洗白仲唔係朗迷
盲蚡:我唔知我唔理,唔撐阿根廷就一定係朗迷
盲蚡:好嬲好嬲,屈唔到條友朗迷點算好
![[369]](/faces/369.gif)
透過 HKG Web 分享一則貼文:【體育台】FIFA幫到盡美國同葡萄牙都出局
https://forum.hkgolden.com/thread/8066695/page/1
弱智盲蚡:出post幫丙朗洗白仲唔係朗迷
盲蚡:我唔知我唔理,唔撐阿根廷就一定係朗迷
盲蚡:好嬲好嬲,屈唔到條友朗迷點算好
同d姜嬸一樣我不是姜粉
![[jerk]cl](/faces/clown/jerk.gif)
透過 HKG Web 分享一則貼文:【體育台】FIFA幫到盡美國同葡萄牙都出局
https://forum.hkgolden.com/thread/8066695/page/1
弱智盲蚡:出post幫丙朗洗白仲唔係朗迷
盲蚡:我唔知我唔理,唔撐阿根廷就一定係朗迷
盲蚡:好嬲好嬲,屈唔到條友朗迷點算好
同d姜嬸一樣我不是姜粉
盲蚡解決方法:我話你係就係,唔需要證據
![[369]](/faces/369.gif)
一到世界盃就有忽然球迷, 球例都未識就死拗
上届決賽阿根廷輸咗幾多個12m 又唔知
仲繼續要拗沙拿嗰個係12m, 係咪智障大家心中有數
一到世界盃就有忽然球迷, 球例都未識就死拗
上届決賽阿根廷輸咗幾多個12m 又唔知
仲繼續要拗沙拿嗰個係12m, 係咪智障大家心中有數
佢哋永遠唔敢逐個point講,永遠拉埋一齊想混淆視聽,我上面都貼晒一堆專業球證解釋如摩連拿佢哋依然扮睇唔到唔敢逐點討論,只識圍爐講100次黑哨以為大話講100次會變真![]()
艾華利斯右腳向後縮佢哋永遠無視,老麥禁區被拉跌,艾華禁區被踩跌佢哋又唔敢反駁![]()
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/17skLK6NDW/
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1BiD2kFxj8/
![[bomb]](/faces/bomb.gif)
一到世界盃就有忽然球迷, 球例都未識就死拗
上届決賽阿根廷輸咗幾多個12m 又唔知
仲繼續要拗沙拿嗰個係12m, 係咪智障大家心中有數
佢哋永遠唔敢逐個point講,永遠拉埋一齊想混淆視聽,我上面都貼晒一堆專業球證解釋如摩連拿佢哋依然扮睇唔到唔敢逐點討論,只識圍爐講100次黑哨以為大話講100次會變真![]()
艾華利斯右腳向後縮佢哋永遠無視,老麥禁區被拉跌,艾華禁區被踩跌佢哋又唔敢反駁![]()
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/17skLK6NDW/
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1BiD2kFxj8/

透過 HKG Web 分享一則貼文:【體育台】FIFA幫到盡美國同葡萄牙都出局
https://forum.hkgolden.com/thread/8066695/page/1
弱智盲蚡:出post幫丙朗洗白仲唔係朗迷
盲蚡:我唔知我唔理,唔撐阿根廷就一定係朗迷
盲蚡:好嬲好嬲,屈唔到條友朗迷點算好
同d姜嬸一樣我不是姜粉
盲蚡解決方法:我話你係就係,唔需要證據
你有證據證明自己無收丙朗錢咩?
![[369]](/faces/369.gif)
嘈咗咁多日仲未肯完
光頭佬都出嚟解釋埋 你班人仲未肯停![]()
https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/articles/cze9z1307p2o
Collina explains referee decisions
With Egypt leading 1-0 in the second half against Argentina, the video assistant referee (VAR) ruled out a goal by Mostafa Zico after midfielder Marwan Attia was penalised for stepping on Lisandro Martinez's foot at the start of the move.
A potential foul on Mohamed Salah in the Argentina penalty area was also waved away, seconds before the reigning champions broke for the stoppage-time winner.
Despite not usually commenting on "specific incidents" during a major tournament, Collina backed both decisions.
"After every goal is scored, the VAR checks the attacking possession phase (APP). If a foul is identified in the build-up and is deemed to have had an impact on the goal, the VAR will recommend an on-field review," he added.
"There is no defined limit regarding either the distance from goal or the amount of time between the incident and the goal.
"An example of this came in the Argentina v Egypt game where Egypt number 19 Marwan Attia clearly treads on the foot of Argentina number six Lisandro Martinez.
"We believe that a foul is a foul. Regardless of whether the foul appears 'obvious', if the referee did not see it on the field of play, the VAR can intervene.
"Equally, if no foul is identified in the build-up to a goal, the VAR will advise the referee accordingly. Stepping on an opponent's foot is a foul, whereas a defender who touches the ball first and then makes normal football contact has not committed a foul.
"Again, an example of this came at the end of the same game. The referee and the VAR deemed it normal football contact between Egypt number 10 Mohamed Salah and Argentina number 9 Julian Alvarez.
"Of course, there will always be an element of subjectivity in some decisions, but we are happy with how this principle has been applied throughout the tournament."
![[369]](/faces/369.gif)
嘈咗咁多日仲未肯完
光頭佬都出嚟解釋埋 你班人仲未肯停![]()
https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/articles/cze9z1307p2o
Collina explains referee decisions
With Egypt leading 1-0 in the second half against Argentina, the video assistant referee (VAR) ruled out a goal by Mostafa Zico after midfielder Marwan Attia was penalised for stepping on Lisandro Martinez's foot at the start of the move.
A potential foul on Mohamed Salah in the Argentina penalty area was also waved away, seconds before the reigning champions broke for the stoppage-time winner.
Despite not usually commenting on "specific incidents" during a major tournament, Collina backed both decisions.
"After every goal is scored, the VAR checks the attacking possession phase (APP). If a foul is identified in the build-up and is deemed to have had an impact on the goal, the VAR will recommend an on-field review," he added.
"There is no defined limit regarding either the distance from goal or the amount of time between the incident and the goal.
"An example of this came in the Argentina v Egypt game where Egypt number 19 Marwan Attia clearly treads on the foot of Argentina number six Lisandro Martinez.
"We believe that a foul is a foul. Regardless of whether the foul appears 'obvious', if the referee did not see it on the field of play, the VAR can intervene.
"Equally, if no foul is identified in the build-up to a goal, the VAR will advise the referee accordingly. Stepping on an opponent's foot is a foul, whereas a defender who touches the ball first and then makes normal football contact has not committed a foul.
"Again, an example of this came at the end of the same game. The referee and the VAR deemed it normal football contact between Egypt number 10 Mohamed Salah and Argentina number 9 Julian Alvarez.
"Of course, there will always be an element of subjectivity in some decisions, but we are happy with how this principle has been applied throughout the tournament."
![[369]](/faces/369.gif)
嘈咗咁多日仲未肯完
光頭佬都出嚟解釋埋 你班人仲未肯停![]()
https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/articles/cze9z1307p2o
Collina explains referee decisions
With Egypt leading 1-0 in the second half against Argentina, the video assistant referee (VAR) ruled out a goal by Mostafa Zico after midfielder Marwan Attia was penalised for stepping on Lisandro Martinez's foot at the start of the move.
A potential foul on Mohamed Salah in the Argentina penalty area was also waved away, seconds before the reigning champions broke for the stoppage-time winner.
Despite not usually commenting on "specific incidents" during a major tournament, Collina backed both decisions.
"After every goal is scored, the VAR checks the attacking possession phase (APP). If a foul is identified in the build-up and is deemed to have had an impact on the goal, the VAR will recommend an on-field review," he added.
"There is no defined limit regarding either the distance from goal or the amount of time between the incident and the goal.
"An example of this came in the Argentina v Egypt game where Egypt number 19 Marwan Attia clearly treads on the foot of Argentina number six Lisandro Martinez.
"We believe that a foul is a foul. Regardless of whether the foul appears 'obvious', if the referee did not see it on the field of play, the VAR can intervene.
"Equally, if no foul is identified in the build-up to a goal, the VAR will advise the referee accordingly. Stepping on an opponent's foot is a foul, whereas a defender who touches the ball first and then makes normal football contact has not committed a foul.
"Again, an example of this came at the end of the same game. The referee and the VAR deemed it normal football contact between Egypt number 10 Mohamed Salah and Argentina number 9 Julian Alvarez.
"Of course, there will always be an element of subjectivity in some decisions, but we are happy with how this principle has been applied throughout the tournament."
其實出面好多都收晒皮,得高登班扮專家先死撐,連var點運作都唔識
嘈咗咁多日仲未肯完
光頭佬都出嚟解釋埋 你班人仲未肯停![]()
https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/articles/cze9z1307p2o
Collina explains referee decisions
With Egypt leading 1-0 in the second half against Argentina, the video assistant referee (VAR) ruled out a goal by Mostafa Zico after midfielder Marwan Attia was penalised for stepping on Lisandro Martinez's foot at the start of the move.
A potential foul on Mohamed Salah in the Argentina penalty area was also waved away, seconds before the reigning champions broke for the stoppage-time winner.
Despite not usually commenting on "specific incidents" during a major tournament, Collina backed both decisions.
"After every goal is scored, the VAR checks the attacking possession phase (APP). If a foul is identified in the build-up and is deemed to have had an impact on the goal, the VAR will recommend an on-field review," he added.
"There is no defined limit regarding either the distance from goal or the amount of time between the incident and the goal.
"An example of this came in the Argentina v Egypt game where Egypt number 19 Marwan Attia clearly treads on the foot of Argentina number six Lisandro Martinez.
"We believe that a foul is a foul. Regardless of whether the foul appears 'obvious', if the referee did not see it on the field of play, the VAR can intervene.
"Equally, if no foul is identified in the build-up to a goal, the VAR will advise the referee accordingly. Stepping on an opponent's foot is a foul, whereas a defender who touches the ball first and then makes normal football contact has not committed a foul.
"Again, an example of this came at the end of the same game. The referee and the VAR deemed it normal football contact between Egypt number 10 Mohamed Salah and Argentina number 9 Julian Alvarez.
"Of course, there will always be an element of subjectivity in some decisions, but we are happy with how this principle has been applied throughout the tournament."
其實出面好多都收晒皮,得高登班扮專家先死撐,連var點運作都唔識
https://www.facebook.com/share/r/195bacgSnq/
睇完條片正常haters都無奈要Stop la, 係D白卡haters 先就會繼續, 或者從來唔睇足球淨係haters果D



嘈咗咁多日仲未肯完
光頭佬都出嚟解釋埋 你班人仲未肯停![]()
https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/articles/cze9z1307p2o
Collina explains referee decisions
With Egypt leading 1-0 in the second half against Argentina, the video assistant referee (VAR) ruled out a goal by Mostafa Zico after midfielder Marwan Attia was penalised for stepping on Lisandro Martinez's foot at the start of the move.
A potential foul on Mohamed Salah in the Argentina penalty area was also waved away, seconds before the reigning champions broke for the stoppage-time winner.
Despite not usually commenting on "specific incidents" during a major tournament, Collina backed both decisions.
"After every goal is scored, the VAR checks the attacking possession phase (APP). If a foul is identified in the build-up and is deemed to have had an impact on the goal, the VAR will recommend an on-field review," he added.
"There is no defined limit regarding either the distance from goal or the amount of time between the incident and the goal.
"An example of this came in the Argentina v Egypt game where Egypt number 19 Marwan Attia clearly treads on the foot of Argentina number six Lisandro Martinez.
"We believe that a foul is a foul. Regardless of whether the foul appears 'obvious', if the referee did not see it on the field of play, the VAR can intervene.
"Equally, if no foul is identified in the build-up to a goal, the VAR will advise the referee accordingly. Stepping on an opponent's foot is a foul, whereas a defender who touches the ball first and then makes normal football contact has not committed a foul.
"Again, an example of this came at the end of the same game. The referee and the VAR deemed it normal football contact between Egypt number 10 Mohamed Salah and Argentina number 9 Julian Alvarez.
"Of course, there will always be an element of subjectivity in some decisions, but we are happy with how this principle has been applied throughout the tournament."
其實出面好多都收晒皮,得高登班扮專家先死撐,連var點運作都唔識
https://www.facebook.com/share/r/195bacgSnq/
睇完條片正常haters都無奈要Stop la, 係D白卡haters 先就會繼續, 或者從來唔睇足球淨係haters果D
不過睇條片留言都唔少力架水軍, 大部分都係lock哂嘅鬼account
真理越辯越明,班躝癱永遠唔敢正面解釋地屠被踩腳點解唔係犯規
埃及球員除衫慶祝點解無黃牌,之後就扯東扯西扯開話題唔答我地提出問題
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1DTuuKt2bM/
https://www.chinapress.com.my/?p=5019558&fbclid=IwVERTSAS9SrpleHRuA2FlbQIxMABzcnRjBmFwcF9pZAwzNTA2ODU1MzE3MjgAAR5yrp0VulX85CnREzYN79wSydL-hJk7tf7qvalHR0VL_yvu1S9IuHJLjHUskg_aem_83wLZm_6arXfBEDAWAnJiA